Tags

, , , , ,

America is at that awkward stage. It’s too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards. — Claire Wolfe

I’m concerned about the mess we’re in. And I don’t see how we are going to fix it any time soon with the “remedies” at hand.

A friend told me, “Romney’s our next nominee.  Obama’s our next president.  Deal with it.”

He agrees with me that our justice system is corrupt and for all intents and purposes non-existent. There is no longer the rule of law.

I don’t know exactly what the date was when the justice system aborted itself as a third branch of our government, but it did. I’m thinking Jan 20, 2009 at 12 noon?

Yet despite all evidence to the contrary, there are some stalwarts who still believe justice will be done, that despite 90 cases brought before the courts seeking to have Obama removed for violating the Constitutional requirement that he be a Natural Born Citizen (2nd generation); that somewhere, somehow, there’s an honest judge in some courtroom in America who is willing to defend the Constitution, no matter the personal cost. 

One of these stalwart patriots is Charlie Kerchner, for whom I have tremendous respect and admiration. He’d be the guy I want beside me on the battlefield.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) was the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al brought by Atty Mario Apuzzo which was taken all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, but turned away every step of the way by court created technicalities such as “standing”.

For the past several months the Pennsylvania resident has been researching and planning for a ballot access challenge/objection to be filed against Obama in Pennsylvania. 

In collaboration with Article II Super PAC, CDR Kerchner has gathered a group of plaintiffs and PA lawyers who plan to bring the challenge.  If you would like to help with this effort in PA, please contact the Article II Super PAC at:  http://www.Art2SuperPAC.com

Last year, Cdr. Kerchner sat for an interview with Sharon Rondeau of the Post Email online publication.  Excerpting those portions that struck me, but urging you to read the whole thing.  I believe Kerchner has stitched the whole Obama story together based on the facts we know, and connecting dots on those areas that are still in the shadows.  I’m picking up the interview at the point where Kerchner talks about the culpability and complicity of our Congress in the Obama cover-up.

MRS. RONDEAU:
Why do you think members of Congress ignored the many letters they received from citizens like you who were concerned?

CDR. KERCHNER:
I’ve written an essay on that called “The Perfect Storm for a Constitutional Crisis.”

The Congress was controlled by the Democrat leadership. I believe that when they gave McCain a pass on his citizenship issues, the RNC and Republicans in the Congress made a deal with the Democrats. The DNC and the Democrats gave McCain a pass and passed a resolution saying that he was a natural born Citizen. That gave him cover and let him run unfettered by that issue, provided that the RNC and McCain didn’t bring up anything about Obama. I think a Faustian pact was made with the devil. The Republicans probably believed that they were going to win the election, but when Obama won, they asked themselves, “What have we done?” and the CYA mode started kicking in.

Unfortunately, the more people who shouted and wrote about it, the more they hunkered down and said, “We’ve got to keep a lid on this.” I believe the President and Cheney and everyone were in on this; they knew it. I think at some point, they called in the major media and said, “We don’t want to have rioting in the streets and charges of racism thrown around by bringing this up now, so you guys can’t talk about this.”

So this was presented as a national security situation if he were investigated then. And I think they just hunkered down and hoped it would go away.

MRS. RONDEAU:
So do you think President Bush knew about it?

CDR. KERCHNER:
Yes. I had written a letter to him, too. I believe he was well aware that there was a qualification issue with Obama and chose to look the other way. I think that the powers that be in the White House said, “We’re going to bring in the key national media people and tell them not to discuss it.”

I remember Rush Limbaugh mentioning once on his show that he had had a secret meeting in Washington. There was also a story on the internet by an investigative group that says that they have an affidavit signed by a major media talk-radio show host who signed an affidavit, for use later, stating that he was in such a meeting.

It appears that they were intimidated by the government, which was then led by Bush, and told that they could not talk about it. It was a potentially explosive situation for the cities if he were to have been investigated and found to be ineligible. So they backed themselves in a corner. They still should have thought of the country and the Constitution first, but they didn’t.

MRS. RONDEAU:
I remember reading the story in Canada Free Press, which stated that there might have been more than one well-known media personality who claimed he was intimidated about the eligibility issue.

CDR. KERCHNER:
How can you shut down all the media in this country? The only way is both political parties have their connections in the powerful media, and they both put the word out: “Don’t touch this.” You see? So you have the RNC and DNC leadership saying,“Shut down; don’t talk about it; it will go away.” Well, it’s not going to go away. Obama is a con-man, a grifter, a liar, and a usurper in the Oval Office.

MRS. RONDEAU:
Many people say that he isn’t American; that he’s a foreigner.

CDR. KERCHNER:
He doesn’t have any American culture. He’s a citizen of the world. If  you read his book, Dreams From My Father, just the title of the book tells you where his thinking is.

*** snip ***

CDR. KERCHNER:  … recently about him and his shenanigans in Chicago. The more I studied the man, the less I knew. He’s an enigma. His whole life has been fabricated out of whole cloth.

MRS. RONDEAU:
Do you think anything he has said about his past is true… his parents, his time in Indonesia, attending high school in Hawaii?

CDR. KERCHNER:
I believe his parents are who he says they are, but I don’t believe his birth date is necessarily true. I think he was likely born in Kenya; the preponderance of the evidence indicates that he was born in Kenya and his birth registered in Hawaii by his grandmother who could have illegally and fraudulently used a mail-in form to register “at home” births. I think his birth date is probably in July in Kenya, which would have allowed more time for the mother to come back to Seattle directly where she started college, or perhaps, via Canada.

I don’t believe she actually returned to Hawaii. I think she was sent to Kenya as a pregnant teenager, as in those days, they used to go away and have the child and put the child up for adoption and re-start their life. I think she was sent to Kenya perhaps late in her second trimester to have the child and leave the child there in the custody of the paternal family to be raised there.

MRS. RONDEAU:
That is something I have not heard. What causes you to believe that?

CDR. KERCHNER:
It explains the statements of the paternal grandmother in Kenya that she was there when the child was born. Also, other Obama Sr. family members say they were there at the hospital when Obama II was born in the hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.

MRS. RONDEAU:
So you think that her original plan was to leave the baby there?

CDR. KERCHNER:
Yes, and come back to college and start a new life. This is the scenario which fits the most facts. Now what could have happened, in my opinion, is that she returned from Canada (I think she went to Kenya and back via Canada because it was a British commonwealth country at the time; it was easy to get to Kenya from Canada and vice versa, because she would have been traveling as the wife of a British subject), and coming back, she just had to take the birth certificate from the Mombasa Hospital to the embassy over there in Kenya and say, “My baby was born here and I want to come home with my baby,” and they would have stamped it as a child of an American citizen, and she returned to Canada and crossed the border into the United States. Then she could have told her mother, “Mom, I couldn’t leave the baby there,” and Grandma says, “What are we going to do? We have to get this baby U.S. citizenship.”

So she could have then filed the mail-in form using the date that she found out about the baby’s return to the U.S. as the date of birth. She could have filed it in the Hawaii Health Department with a mail-in form. However, it appears they didn’t in the end finally accept it. Did you notice that on the form, it says “Filed” but not “Accepted”?

MRS. RONDEAU:
Yes, I did. So would that have meant that it was incomplete? Could the Health Department have received it and not known what to do with it?

CDR. KERCHNER:
They could have received it in the mail or the grandmother could have dropped it off at their office, but when the processors several days later looked at it, they said,“Well, we need more evidence here than just the signature of one relative.” Maybe Grandma

Dunham forged the daughter’s signature, too, because I don’t think Stanley Ann was in Hawaii then. There is no record of her being there at that time. During the period of time when he was allegedly born there, there is no record of any hospital or doctor having any records on the baby or Stanley Ann being there.

Tim Adams, the new fellow who just came forward, confirms that. So she could have “filed” it, and they probably sent a request back to Grandma Dunham as the “filer” a couple of weeks later saying that they needed to have a midwife’s statement or the name of a paramedic who was called to the scene, or a neighbor who might have witnessed that there was a lot of noise and commotion there “at home”during the birthing process, because a 17- or 18-year-old-girl giving birth the first time is not an easy event. It would seem if somebody had known that something was going on, they  would have called paramedics or someone, or driven her to the hospital. To just say that he was born at home with no witnesses is not plausible.

MRS. RONDEAU:
It makes one wonder, where was the mother? Why wouldn’t the mother have gone in to the Health Department and applied for a birth certificate?

CDR. KERCHNER:
I believe the reason she didn’t herself is that she was not in Hawaii in August 1961. I believe Grandma Dunham falsely and illegally filed the registration form declaring Obama was born at home with no independent witnesses. She may have likely also forged her daughter’s signature on the birth registration form. Grandma Dunham did this for the purpose of illegally getting her new grandson U.S. Citizenship. Birth registration fraud was easy given Hawaii’s lax laws in 1961. And, the simple filing of the birth registration triggered those birth announcements, because the Health Department Statistics Office gave that list out every week. So the simple filing of the birth registration, fraudulent or otherwise,got the name on the list for publication in the newspapers.

MRS. RONDEAU:
Even if the filing was not complete?

CDR. KERCHNER:
Yes, even if it was never accepted in the end, it was already published in the paper within days of the birth if any filings were listed there. They didn’t investigate immediately. There was a process it had to go through. But the simple filing of the registration of birth triggered the state to place the child’s name of the list of births registered with the state that week.

MRS. RONDEAU:
Do you have any idea as to why Stanley Ann might have decided to keep the baby if originally she had planned to leave him in Kenya?

CDR. KERCHNER:
I believe maternal instincts kicked in. Did you read the statements of the woman who befriended her in Seattle? Apparently she didn’t even know how to diaper the baby properly and things like that. She needed training. So I think she came directly back from Kenya via Canada or from Kenya directly to Seattle with a baby who was three or four weeks old at that point since I believe Obama’s real birth date was not in August, but likely earlier, possibly July, and she was just learning how to take care of him.

MRS. RONDEAU:
There might have been no one to show her, because it doesn’t appear that she was living with her parents at the time.

CDR. KERCHNER:
Well, I think when she decided to go home to the U.S. with the baby,the family over in Kenya was upset with her probably saying, “Oh, no, no; this is what we agreed to! You’ve been living here now for three or four months, and you were supposed to give up the baby!” While she was in Kenya with the new born the family there probably helped out with the initial care of the baby.

Read the entire interview here.