Tags

,

My congressional representative Bill Posey (R-FL) tried to address the question of Obama’s eligibility to serve as president (albeit in an oblique way at the beginning of the 111th Congressional session) with HR 1503, but despite attracting a dozen co-sponsors, the bill never saw the light of day on the House floor.

Posey took a ration of crap for it too, both in the media and among his congressional confreres who couldn’t back away from it fast enough. And though he intended to resubmit the bill in a more detailed and refined form in the 112th Congressional Session, Posey didn’t do it. Here’s a description of HR 1503.

“To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the office of President to include with the committee’s statement of organization a copy of the candidate’s birth certificate, together with such other documentation as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution.”

Now a California man is petitioning his House rep, Brian Bilbray of California’s 50th Congressional District, to address the issue. David Larocque’s not the first constituent to bring this matter to the attention of the representative being paid handsomely with Larocque’s tax dollars to represent him in Congress.

Nor is this the first time Larocque has addressed the issue with him.  Bilbray, like many other lily-livered lawmakers, runs for cover whenever his employer Larocque demands answers.

Thus far, Bilbray, along with every other member of Congress, will NOT deal with it. Why? What are they afraid of?  Who are they afraid of?  Certainly not the people who pay their salaries…

The letter:

Congressman Bilbray:

I was on your conference call last night but I had to leave when I could no longer listen to your discussion of peripheral issues while we have a serious constitutional crisis underway arising from an undocumented individual, almost certainly a usurper, in the White House.

Please read the following short message, after which I respectfully request that you advise your constituents what you intend to do about it:

A message to all American citizens:

Seattle-based digital scanner expert Doug Vogt is interviewed in this video by Rev James David Manning concerning Vogt’s testimony at the Georgia ballot challenge hearing in Atlanta on Jan 26:

Working with New York-based digital document expert Paul Irey, additional analysis by Vogt and Irey has demonstrated incontrovertibly and without a shred of doubt that the purported Obama Certificate of Live Birth presented on national television on April 27, 2011 is an unequivocal forgery, that the purported document was forged by one individual in the Hawaii Department of Health, and that the forger was apparently acting under coercion based on certain clues that were intentionally hidden in the digital signature of the document.

Vogt also asserts that the birth registration number shown in the forgery is of a certainty the number assigned to Baby Virginia Sunahara, a child born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961 with medical problems which resulted in her death on the following day. Virginia Sunahara’s brother has requested a copy of his sister’s original birth certificate, to which he is entitled under both state and federal laws, but has met with stonewalling by government agencies in Hawaii. A lawsuit recently filed in Hawaii on his behalf will eventually force the release of this damning evidence, although it is not needed to prove the forgery.

Vogt conducted research on the law of treason in Title 18 of the U.S. Code. This law was adopted by the second U.S. Congress and was signed by President George Washington, along with companion laws for misprision of treason applicable to those who are complicit in an act of treason or who are aware of the treason and fail to report it to appropriate authority. These laws were adopted in response to the monstrous treason committed by the turncoat General Benedict Arnold during the Revolutionary War in order to protect the security of the nation from such betrayal in the future.

The penalty prescribed for such treason is the most severe available under the law.

The evidence is mounting and can no longer be denied. Barack Obama knowingly misrepresented his eligibility for the office of president and is thereby subject to a charge of high treason.

Those who assisted Obama or who were aware of Obama’s ineligibility are subject to felony charges of misprision of treason.

The number of persons in this latter category undoubtedly number in the thousands, if not tens of thousands, specifically including virtually the entire leadership and governing structure of the Democratic Party.

The fact is that we, the people of the United States of America, do not know with certainty the true identity of the president of the United States. There is not a shred of legally-admissible evidence which establishes Barack Obama’s place of birth, his parentage, his U.S. citizenship status, or even his true name.

We have vested the power of the presidency and the command of U.S. military forces in an undocumented individual.

If this were not true, it would be considered so improbable that it could only take place in a work of fiction.

This is without a doubt the greatest crime ever committed against the American people. The damage done to the nation by the crimes of Barack Obama is incalculable.

Any American who believes that Barack Obama should be allowed on the ballot for the next presidential election must answer to legitimate questions about where that person’s true loyalties lie. Supporting an unconstitutional president is simply irreconcilable with the preservation of the U.S. Constitution and the Rule of Law.

David F LaRocque
CDR USNR (ret)
Captain TWA (ret)
Carlsbad, CA