Glenn Beck asks, Is Joe Sestak a liar?
Or is he covering for a felon?
I don’t envy Joe because these people will destroy you. I think people’s lives, their families are at stake.
I don’t envy Joe Sestak the choice he has to make. He has only one choice. Tell the truth.
Karl Rove:
One of two things is true, you can’t have two things true. One or the other is true. Either Joe Sestak is lying and he was not offered a position in the administration in return for getting out of the primary.
You know he’s a liar, in which case not worthy of public service.
Or, he’s telling the truth, in which case somebody inside the White House committed a felony. 18usc211 says that, a government official cannot promise a job in return for anything of value and it has a long list of values.
Saying to a member of Congress if you drop out of the primary and give a free ride to the general election for our Democratic nominee in return for which we will give you a government job, is clearly receiving something of value. The value is a clear path to the nomination of your favorite candidate…..
What he in essence is saying is that there’s a felon inside the White House and I am going to stonewall and protect that individual. He has an obligation to tell. Either you’re a liar, Joe Sestak, or you’re protecting a felon.
Liar covering for liars. Don’t worry they’ll get their media b@#&hes to sweep all this away. Keith Olberfarce or Chris “Mr Tingly” Matthews will put on their autographed knee pads and clean this all up!
The problem with Joe is he is not between a rock and a hard place. Whether his claim is true or not, he should have considered the consequences prior to the statement that he might actually win. Now he is part of a party that is going to hate him regardless of the outcome. If he lied he has cost the DEMS a Senate seat. If he is telling the truth he is going to cost the DEMS a Senate seat simply because the moderate DEMS will turn on Obama. Obama is going to come out and say that yes there was a conversation however Joe misunderstood not only the words but the intent. Yes we did tell Joe that polls did not indicate he could win. Yes, we did discourage him from forcing Specter to spend millions of dollars on a primary when he would need it in the general election. Yes we did say there are jobs available in the administration like Secretary of the Navy or others. However, what we did not say is that if you drop out we would secure a specific job or any job for him. We are disappointed that he construed the conversation in that light. It was merely a matter of bad communication. Now that Joe is with us we will accept him with open arms and assist as much as possible with his campaign. Old Joe will have to choice but to echo the same information and statement that perhaps he was hasty and did not understand the communication correctly. The end results is they are both liars.
Pingback: » Links To Visit – 05/27/10 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter